Cases 31 - 40 of 41
FOSTER v. HOLMAN et al
as 1:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
KENDELL CHARLES FOSTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL HOLMAN and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STRICKENGLOSS v. STATE CORRECTION INSTITUTION AT MERCER et al
as 2:2012cv00361
Plaintiff:
DAVID STRICKENGLOSS
Defendant:
STATE CORRECTION INSTITUTION AT MERCER, MORGAN, HORNEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABBOTT v. MACHEN et al
as 2:2012cv00308
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC JOSEPH ABBOTT
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. MACHEN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SCI PITTSBURGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOOERS v. PELZER et al
as 2:2011cv01583
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARL MOOERS
Defendant:
JOSEPH PELZER and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT WCCF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIA v. MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
as 1:2011cv00280
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. SANTIA
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, ERIE COUNTY PRISON and DR. BARAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. CELANI, et al
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
ROSHA C. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CELANI, ROBERT SHANNON and MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BORTZ v. CLEARFIELD COUNTY et al
as 3:2008cv00047
Plaintiff:
SHANE BORTZ
Defendant:
CLEARFIELD COUNTY, CLEARFIELD COUNTY PRISON BOARD MEMBERS, WARDEN LOMBARDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IBARRA v. ZENK et al
as 3:2007cv00337
Plaintiff:
MANUEL IBARRA
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZENK, MS. DAWSON, DR. ROMEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PISKANIN v. PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2007cv00262
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. PISKANIN
Defendant:
PA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, EDWARD RENDELL, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MYERS v. CANINO et al
as 1:2007cv00079
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. MYERS
Defendant:
MARY CANINO, SMITH, GADDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
