Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 107 of 107
THE UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AS RECEIVER FOR PENNY LANE PARTNERS, L.P. v. STEFANSKY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv01967
Plaintiff: THE UNITED STATES SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION AS RECEIVER FOR PENNY LANE PARTNERS, L.P.
Defendant: DAVID STEFANSKY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv01805
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Frederick Schiff
as 08-1909
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: FREDERICK S. SCHIFF
Amicus Appellee: RICHARD J. LANE
USA v. Frederick Schiff
as 08-1903
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee: FREDERICK S. SCHIFF
Amicus Appellee: RICHARD J. LANE
LINCOLN ADVENTURES LLC et al v. THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON MEMBERS OF SYNDICATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00235
In Re: INSURANCE BROKERAGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: STEPHEN G. AQUILINA, LUCIANA J. AQUILINA, AUDRA M. LANE and others
Plaintiff: LINCOLN ADVENTURES LLC and MICHIGAN MULTI-KING INC
Defendant: THOSE CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON MEMBERS OF SYNDICATES, MARSH PRIVATE CLIENT SERVICES, MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LANE et al
as 2:2007mc00306
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: ROBERT E. LANE, WEALTH POOLS INTERNATIONAL, INC., RECRUIT FOR WEALTH, INC. and others
Receiver: DENISE D. DELL-POWELL
USA v. Mema et al
as 3:2007mc00284
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Bedri Mema and 700 Park View Lane

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?