Cases 11 - 20 of 6,947
Cindy Pineda-Calix v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2016
Petitioner:
CINDY LISBETH PINEDA-CALIX
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
QUICK STOP OF ERIE, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
QUICK STOP OF ERIE, INC a Pennsylvania Corporation doing business as Quick Stop Food Store and Ajita Nitin Patel
Defendant:
United States of America
Magno Guerrero-Guerrero, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2012
Petitioner:
MAGNO JOSELITO GUERRERO-GUERRERO, SONIA ESPERANZA TAPIA-CUESTA and JOFFRE ALEXANDER GUERRERO-TAPIA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
David Aquino, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1996
Petitioner:
DAVID CANAHUI AQUINO, MAYRA ISABEL ACETUN IXCOPAL, L. S. C. A. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nelson Da Costa-Lima, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1990
Petitioner:
NELSON JOSE DA COSTA-LIMA, ANA CLARA FERREIRA-LLIMA COSTA and E. F.-L. C.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mars Eshnazarov, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1980
Petitioner:
MARS NABIIEVICH ESHNAZAROV and ZHAZGUL KANYBEKOVNA ESHNAZAROVA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Suchite-Salguero v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1970
Petitioner:
JOSE EFRAIN SUCHITE-SALGUERO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Miguel Robles Corcuera v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1963
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL ROBLES CORCUERA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael ReynoldsIn re: Michael Reynolds
as 24-1933
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Trokan Diahn v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1932
Petitioner:
TROKAN MORRIS DIAHN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
