Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 621
Garland AdamsIn re: Garland Adams
as 23-3106
Petitioner: In re: GARLAND ADAMS
Respondent: LAUREL HARRY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
ADAMS et al v. OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP
as 2:2023cv22619
Petitioner: AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC., J. MICHAEL ADAMS, AMY BRADLEY and others
Respondent: OLSHAN FROME WOLOSKY LLP
Intervenor: JULIUS D. RUDOLPH, DRIVER OPPORTUNITY PARTNERS I, L.P., IZZY and others
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff: CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant: NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Woods et al v. Bain et al
as 1:2023cv01158
Plaintiff: Lori Woods and Makar Stozhyk
Defendant: Adam Bain, Cipora Herman, Jonathan Jaffe and others
Nominal Defendant: Opendoor Technologies, Inc.
Kent v. Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff: Michael Kent
Defendant: Tabula Rasa Healthcare, Inc., Michael Purcell, Brian Adams and others
USA v. Adam Scott We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2769
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ADAM SCOTT
Brandon AdamsIn re: Brandon Adams
as 23-2439
Petitioner: In re: BRANDON ADAMS
Respondent: NAVIENT CORP
Johnson v. Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00789
Plaintiff: William Johnson
Defendant: Diffusion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Robert Cobuzzi, Jr., Jane H. Hollingsworth and others
TOMASZEWSKI et al v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv03888
Plaintiff: SLAWOMIR TOMASZEWSKI, ARTUR PRAZAK, MICHAL JAN SZWARC and others
Defendant: U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2267
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?