Cases 101 - 110 of 85,345
GUNTHER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06483
Petitioner:
TALEAF GUNTHER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BELL v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv06504
Petitioner:
KENT BELL
Respondent:
WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, JUDGE FRANCIS A. MCGROGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SAUZO v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04545
Petitioner:
CARLOS SAUZO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Christopher West v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1611
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER H. WEST
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
PISCIOTTA v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04470
Petitioner:
VINCENT PISCIOTTA
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
IN RE: RASHAAN BATES
as 2:2024cv02325
Petitioner:
RASHAAN BATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EUCEDA-CANALES v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06415
Petitioner:
MELVIN EUCEDA-CANALES
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. Demby et al
as 1:2024mc00257
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Captain Kennard Demby, Jr., Captain Sennett and Bureau Chief Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARKER v. R. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06432
Petitioner:
BRANDON EARL BARKER
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRYANT v. R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv06417
Petitioner:
RONNIE L. BRYANT
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
