Cases 1 - 8 of 8
York County, Pennsylvania v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv01151
Defendant:
EIDP, Inc., 3M Company, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co. and others
Plaintiff:
York County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
LEHIGH COUNTY AUTHORITY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 5:2023cv02652
Defendant:
EIDP, INC., 3M COMPANY, BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. and others
Plaintiff:
LEHIGH COUNTY AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
THE BOROUGH OF EMMAUS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 5:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
THE BOROUGH OF EMMAUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., CARRIER GLOBAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY OF WESTMORELAND COUNTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., CARRIER GLOBAL CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
THE BOROUGH OF AMBLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
THE BOROUGH OF AMBLER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, BUCKEYE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO., CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MUNDINE v. ETHICON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv15878
Defendant:
DAVOL INC., GETINGE AB, MAQUET CARDIOVASCULAR, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MUNDINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAY v. SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD et al
as 3:2019cv07963
Defendant:
VAPOR DNA, JOHN DOES 1-100, LAN & MIKE INTERNATIONAL TRADING, INC. and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG SDI CO. LTD.
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
SCOTT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv08922
Plaintiff:
DEMETRICE L SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER , INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
