Cases 11 - 20 of 3,589
PRINCE OF PEACE ENTERPRISES, INC. v. GEOPEAK ENERGY, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02610
Plaintiff:
PRINCE OF PEACE ENTERPRISES, INC.
Defendant:
GEOPEAK ENERGY, LLC and MICHAEL KOPING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
LIVINGSTON v. UBER et al
as 2:2024cv05839
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
UBER and LYFT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTHEWS v. SALDUTTI LAW GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01662
Plaintiff:
SAMEERAH M. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SALDUTTI LAW GROUP LLC and ROBERT L. SALDUTTI ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PIERCE et al v. KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
as 2:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
NATALIE PIERCE and MICHELLE INGRODI
Defendant:
KLOVER HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
OXCEVA et al v. JEAN E. NOEL et al
as 2:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
CARMELITE NOISETTE OXCEVA and WESLAIRE HENRY OXCEVA
Defendant:
JEAN E. NOEL and MADIANITE MARCELLUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
GRODNICK v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv02616
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRODNICK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., KENVUE INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MOSCATO et al v. LOPINTO et al
as 3:2024cv05720
Defendant:
ROBERT MOSCATO, LORI MOSCATO, SWOF VENTURES, LP. and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
BOBACK v. GEISLER et al
as 2:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BOBACK
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. GEISLER, ESQ., MICHAEL A. DORUNDO and CYNTHIA M. DORUNDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Estate of Arlene Sears et al v. U.S. Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Estate of Arlene Sears and Estate of Eliza R. Thorne
Defendant:
U.S. Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Vida Capital Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
