Cases 71 - 80 of 3,612
Metzger v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Charles Metzger
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC doing business as XFINITY and CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MATTHEWS v. SALDUTTI LAW GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01662
Plaintiff:
SAMEERAH M. MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SALDUTTI LAW GROUP LLC and ROBERT L. SALDUTTI ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sam Antar v. BetMGM LLC, et al
as 24-1364
Plaintiff:
SAM A. ANTAR
Defendant:
BETMGM LLC, BORGATA HOTEL CASINO AND SPA and MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL INC
KUHN v. WILLFORD
as 2:2024cv01123
Plaintiff:
PETER KUHN
Defendant:
JOVAN WILLFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
HARRIS v. VIVINT, INC.
as 1:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
HARRIS DOUGHTY and DOUGHTY HARRIS
Defendant:
VIVINT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
LIVINGSTON v. WILLIAMS
as 2:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY TALMADGE LIVINGSTON
Defendant:
MERLYN WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DURHAM v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
JESSICA DURHAM
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Costa et al v. Whirlpool Corporation
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Stacy Costa, Nathaniel Guerrero, Missy Robinson and others
Defendant:
Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
GENEVA DANIELS, STEPHANIE DANIELS, DEIDRA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
STEPHANIE DANIELS, DEIDRA DANIELS, JESSICA DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
