Cases 1 - 10 of 268
PORWAL v. PNC BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Praful Porwal
Defendant:
PNC BANK, N.A., PNC BANCORP, INC., PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Smith v. F&M Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01951
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
F&M Bank, Joy Heinbaugh, Todd A. Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PALAMERICAN SECURITY, INC. v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
as 2:2023cv01835
Plaintiff:
PALAMERICAN SECURITY, INC.
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
WILSON v. TRUIST BANK
as 2:2023cv03898
Plaintiff:
GARRETT QUINCY WILSON
Defendant:
TRUIST BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
AJIMOBI et al v. PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2023cv06356
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH AJIMOBI and KALAWDLE AJIMOBI
Defendant:
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICING and PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
DUFF et al v. M&T BANK et al
as 2:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. DUFF, BEVERLY DUFFY and MICHAEL F. DUFFY, SR.
Defendant:
M&T BANK and LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BYRD v. MORTGAGE RESEARCH CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv01213
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BYRD
Defendant:
MORTGAGE RESEARCH CENTER doing business as VETERANS UNTIED HOME LOANS, MIDFIRST BANK and THE MONEY SOURCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
DONAHUE et al v. SYNCHRONY BANK
as 1:2022cv07306
Plaintiff:
KEITH DONAHUE and DOCTOR FIX-IT, LLC
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
BUSSEY, III v. SYNCHRONY BANK
as 3:2022cv07240
Plaintiff:
HARRY B. BUSSEY, III
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BUSSEY, III v. SYNCHRONY BANK
as 3:2022cv07241
Plaintiff:
HARRY B. BUSSEY, III
Defendant:
SYNCHRONY BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
