Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Phillip Hunter v. Fillmore Capital Partners LLC, et al
as 24-1606
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP HUNTER
Defendant:
FILLMORE CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC
UNITED STATES v. MWW GROUP LLC
as 2:2023cv20757
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Respondent:
MWW GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
ACHENBACH v. VISION REALTY MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03251
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ACHENBACH
Defendant:
VISION REALTY MANAGEMENT LLC, VISION CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INC, VISION PROPERTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
KANTORCZYK v. COOK et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
BRYAN KANTORCZYK
Defendant:
GENE COOK and GENE COOK SUPPORTS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WARREN
as 2:2021cv04511
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TIMOTHY D. WARREN and TITAN MEDICAL COMPLIANCE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Douglas v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2021cv01411
Plaintiff:
Hoyt Douglas
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Convergent Outsourcing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. Goodfish Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv01722
Defendant:
Goodfish Enterprises, LLC and Christopher Lukacs
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Trupharma, LLC.
as 1:2020cv01677
Defendant:
Trupharma, LLC. and TruPharma, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Perrigo New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NEARY et al
as 3:2020cv14167
Defendant:
VERTICAL SOURCE, INC., SHERMAN BARTON, CHRISTOPHER R. NEARY and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Whaley v. Midland Funding, LLC
as 4:2020cv01681
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC
Plaintiff:
George Whaley, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
