Cases 11 - 20 of 21
SORACE et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2020cv04318
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH YERTY, KIMBERLY SOLOMON-ROBINSON, LINDA ZARONSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fragale V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2020cv01667
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Frank Fragale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AZIR v. WELLS FARGO BANK
as 3:2019cv18837
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK
Plaintiff:
AMGAD AZIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREENBLATT et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2017cv01291
Plaintiff:
JOHANNE P. GREENBLATT and SAMUEL GREENBLATT
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
STEINBERG et al v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 2:2016cv04589
Plaintiff:
HOWARD STEINBERG and LINDA STEINBERG
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MUHAMMAD v. MORTGAGE CONTRACTING SERVICES et al
as 2:2014cv02684
Plaintiff:
ABDUL ALI MUHAMMAD
Defendant:
MORTGAGE CONTRACTING SERVICES, CONCENTRIC EQUITY PARTNERS, WELLS FARGO N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Gage v. Frank Provenzano, et al
as 14-1241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK J. PROVENZANO, Somerset County Sheriff, STATE JUDGE MARY C. JACOBSON, ATTORNEY GREGG P. TABAKIN and others
GAGE v. PROVENZANO et al
as 3:2013cv02256
Plaintiff:
THOMAS I. GAGE
Defendant:
FRANK J. PROVENZANO, MARY C. JACOBSON , NICHOLAS J. CANOVA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. v. WACHOVIA BANK, NA et al
as 2:2010cv07253
Plaintiff:
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
Defendant:
WACHOVIA BANK, NA, WACHOVIA CORPORATION, WELLS FARGO BANK, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
as 5:2010cv04681
Plaintiff:
META C. SMITH
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
