Cases 1 - 10 of 16
In re: Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litigation
as 23-3089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE PC, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, DR. ANDREW KLEIN and JOHN IVAN SUTTER, M.D.
Defendant / Appellant:
MERCK & CO INC
IN RE ROTAVIRUS VACCINES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2018cv01851
Plaintiff:
SCHWARTZ PEDIATRICS S.C.
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
SUGARTOWN PEDIATRICS, LLC v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2018cv01734
Plaintiff:
SUGARTOWN PEDIATRICS, LLC
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
NAKASHIMA et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2014cv06447
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. NAKASHIMA and BELLAFLOR A. TROMPETA
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
VALUE DRUG COMPANY. et al v. ASTRAZENECA PLC. et al
as 3:2012cv05525
Plaintiff:
VALUE DRUG COMPANY and BURLINGTON DRUG CO. INC.
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PLC, ATRAZENECA LP, ATRAZENECA AB and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
KLEIN v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2012cv03857
Plaintiff:
ANDREW KLEIN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE, P.C. v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 2:2012cv03555
Plaintiff:
CHATOM PRIMARY CARE, P.C., DR. ANDREW KLEIN and JOHN I. SUTTER, M.D.
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Petitioner:
BELLAFLOR A. TROMPETA and GEORGE E. NAKASHIMA, M.D.
Respondent:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE (GSK)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 572 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 3:2012cv01379
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 572 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
In Re: K-Dur Antitrust
as 10-4571
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LA WHSLE DRUG CO INC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, RITE AID CORP, CVS CORP and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MERCK & CO INC and UPSHER-SMITH LAB INC
In Re: K-Dur Antitrust, et al
as 10-2727
Appellant:
MERCK & CO INC
Defendant - Appellant:
UPSHER-SMITH LAB INC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
