Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States of America v. Geisinger Health et al
as 4:2020cv01383
Defendant:
Geisinger Health and Evangelical Community Hospital
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03768
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA and others
Defendant:
EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
In Re:
STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL LITIGATION
Respondent:
STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL PLAINTIFFS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CESAR CASTILLO, INC. v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01671
Defendant:
ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL. INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CESAR CASTILLO, INC.
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. et al v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01666
Plaintiff:
FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C, SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, CSAR CASTILLO, INC. and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., BRECKENRIDGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., UDL LABORATORIES INC. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
QUALITEST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
IN RE: GENERIC PHARMACEUTICALS PRICING ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2016md02724
Defendant:
GENERIC DIGOXIN AND DOXYCYCLINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICALS CO., INC., MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC. and others
In Re:
DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS PSC, INDIRECT RESELLERS PSC, IN RE: GENERIC DIGOXIN AND DOXYCYCLINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION and others
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Special Master:
DAVID H. MARION, LINDA D. PERKINS, BRUCE P. MERENSTEIN and others
Respondent:
SUSAN KNOBLAUCH and KAREN STRELAU
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
