Antitrust Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/I.P. TASK FORCE et al
as 2:2017cv00251
Plaintiff: UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE/I.P. TASK FORCE and ROBERT A. POTTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2017cv00255
Plaintiff: UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and FRANCES E. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2017cv00254
Plaintiff: UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 2:2017cv00256
Plaintiff: UNIVERSAL NETWORK INNOVATIONS, LLC
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and RENATA B. HESSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2016md02687
Plaintiff: Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority, CITY OF FERGUS FALLS, MINNESOTA, INTERSTATE CHEMICAL CO., INC. and others
Defendant: VINCENT J. OPALEWSKI, SOUTHERN IONICS, INC., C&S CHEMICALS (OF GEORGIA) INC. and others
Intervenor: US Department of Justice and Lawrence McShane
Special Master: DENNIS M. CAVANAUGH and JUDGE FAITH S. HOCHBERG
In Re: LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?