Cases 101 - 110 of 720
DOE 1 v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv05636
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 1
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, DELAWARE COUNTY JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER, CHILD GUIDANCE RESOURCE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourcade v. John Doe 1-8 et al
as 2:2021cv05607
Plaintiff:
Florencia Fourcade
Defendant:
John Doe 1-8, JANE DOE 1-3 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schwenk v. Garcia et al
as 1:2021cv02079
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Schwenk
Defendant:
Joseph Garcia, Corrections Special Application Unit, LLC, York County, Pennsylvania doing business as York County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv05334
Plaintiff:
Ryan Martin and Ali Martin
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Detective Christopher Sweeney, Lieutenant Waley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. BURGER et al
as 2:2021cv01751
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SMITH
Defendant:
ZACHARY BURGER, DANA NOWALK, JAMIE COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McQuaid v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv02019
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. McQuaid
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Laurel Harry, John/Jane Does 1 - 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. READING RECREATION COMMISSION et al
as 5:2021cv04851
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
READING RECREATION COMMISSION and DAPHNE E. KLAHR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROLON v. ROE et al
as 2:2021cv04779
Plaintiff:
JOSE ROLON
Defendant:
RICHARD ROE, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GENCO v. LUFFEY et al
as 2:2021cv01518
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. GENCO, III
Defendant:
CHRISTINE LUFFEY, MEAGAN MONTMENY, CAMILLE BURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04625
Plaintiff:
ERIC AKEEM FERRON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MICHAEL SCHMIDT, MARC BO MARCHETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
