Cases 21 - 30 of 171
COY v. GUY et al
as 3:2020cv15947
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 7, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS STRIKE TASK FORCE, DANIEL MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOSHNICK v. LYNOTT et al
as 2:2020cv13818
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 6-100, SHAMEIKIA, JANE DOE 6-100 and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY A. KOSHNICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. WESTROCK COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv09355
Plaintiff:
BROCK ANDERSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, WESTROCK SERVICES, LLC and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
DORVAL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TREASURY DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv05997
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10, JOHN DOES 1-5, JOHN FURDA and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN L DORVAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Valdez v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2020cv00671
Defendant:
John Does 6-10, John Does 1-5, John Does 11-15 and others
Plaintiff:
Elisha Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEVLIN v. LACEY TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2020cv04068
Defendant:
DIMITRIOS TSARNAS, JOHN DOES 6-10, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
PAIGE E. DEVLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
DEMORO v. TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO et al
as 3:2020cv02206
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 6-10, JOHN DOES 1-5, TOWNSHIP OF MARLBORO and others
Plaintiff:
JENELLE DEMORO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FITZPATRICK v. TOWNSHIP OF HAZLET et al
as 3:2020cv01779
Defendant:
ROBERT J. DICKENS, JOHN DOES 6-10, MICHAEL DUNCAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACERRA v. THOMAS et al
as 3:2019cv19933
Defendant:
RICHARD THOMAS, DAVID KELSO, ASBURY PARK and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS H ACERRA and THOMAS H. ACERRA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITFIELD et al v. SHARON HILL BOROUGH et al
as 2:2019cv04217
Defendant:
P/O JOHN DOE 6, P/O JOHN DOE 2, P/O JOHN DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff:
LAMAR WHITFIELD and ASHLEY MCCLINTOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
