Cases 31 - 40 of 79
FREEMAN v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE
as 2:2016cv04845
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FREEMAN
Defendant:
CITY OF EAST ORANGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RHETT v. NEW JERSEY STATE SUPERIOR TRUST UNIT et al
as 2:2016cv01662
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. RHETT
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE SUPERIOR TRUST UNIT, FIREMANS INSURANCE COMPANY, DEE PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOSCO et al v. POWELSON et al
as 2:2015cv02798
Plaintiff:
COSMO LOSCO , MARYANNE LOSCO and CD LOSCO, LLC
Defendant:
ROBERT F. POWELSON, JOHN F. COLEMAN, JR., JAMES H. CAWLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
DENISE FREEMAN
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FREEMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2014cv03879
Plaintiff:
DARRYL QUINN FREEMAN
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankin v. Majikes et al
as 3:2014cv00699
Plaintiff:
James Rankin
Defendant:
John Majikes , Scott Hine , Joseph Zigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 5:2014cv01944
Plaintiff:
DENISE FREEMAN
Defendant:
ALLENTOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NEELY v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2014cv01403
Defendant:
ZACHARY HARRIS, M. STREETER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES FREEMAN NEELY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. LUTHERAN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv01085
Plaintiff:
JAMES FREEMAN
Defendant:
LUTHERAN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, VICTORIA BUSCH, ROBERT BLACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 2:2014cv01047
Plaintiff:
JAMES FREEMAN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, TIMENE FARLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
