Cases 31 - 40 of 163
Vasquez v. Gale et al
as 1:2020cv01805
Defendant:
Martha Gale, President Judge Richard A. Lewis, Adrian and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03062
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOES 1-10, LIEUTENANT JONAH CONWAY and others
Plaintiff:
OFFICER KELLI LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Mumma v. Morgan et al
as 1:2020cv00458
Defendant:
OldCastle, George Hadley, Ronald Katzman and others
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Mumma, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley et al v. Clark et al
as 4:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Chris Haines, Greg Mendenhall, UPMC Pinnacle and others
Plaintiff:
Carmen Riley and Thomas Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murrell v. Consiglio et al
as 1:2020cv00261
Defendant:
Brenda S. Shaffer, Edward Marsico, Judge Richard Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Murrell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Boucher v. Lupacchini et al
as 3:2019cv02106
Defendant:
Donald Aderson, Leonard Lichvar, Charlie Charlesworth and others
Plaintiff:
Peggy Boucher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROTHERS v. PSP et al
as 2:2019cv01303
Defendant:
NESHANNOCK POLICE, TPR. SHAWN KING, TPR. ROMAN SHABLESKY and others
Plaintiff:
TIYONDA BROTHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEWIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2019cv04408
Defendant:
DAVID TYLER, JUDGE ANTHONY SCANLON, KEVIN F. KELLY and others
Plaintiff:
TORREY TYREE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEINIK v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION et al
as 2:2019cv03503
Defendant:
PHILLIP ACEVEDO, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, TEMPLE UNIVERSITY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WEINIK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv02847
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THOMAS KANE and DETECTIVE JAMES HUGHES
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
