Cases 31 - 40 of 130
Anstine v. Adams et al
as 1:2020cv02160
Defendant:
Matthew J. Updegrove, Jane Doe, Jerome Michael Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mark Anstine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2020cv15281
Defendant:
ATLANTICARE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, JOHN DOE SECURITY OFFICERS 1-10, MIKE CAMP and others
Plaintiff:
TRAYSHAWN ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. LEBRON et al
as 5:2020cv04331
Defendant:
OFFICER JONATHAN SMITH, CITY OF ALLENTOWN, OFFICER SCOT WALZ and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Colombo et al
as 3:2020cv01103
Defendant:
District Attorney Patrick Robinson and Officer Colombo
Plaintiff:
Steven Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ABUNDANT LIFE CHURCH et al v. MURPHY
as 3:2020cv06557
Plaintiff:
PASTOR SAMUEL PEREZ, GRACE REFORM CHURCH OF JERSEY CITY, GRACE BIBLE CHURCH and others
Defendant:
GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
409-415 BERGENLINE AVE. UC, LLC v. MORALES et al
as 2:2020cv03837
Defendant:
FRANCIS HERNANDEZ, AGUSTIN MOLINA, JOHN DOES, 1-9 and others
Plaintiff:
409-415 BERGENLINE AVE. UC, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. U.S. GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2020cv02402
Defendant:
U.S. GOVERNMENT, ICE DHF and DHS
Plaintiff:
VICTOR MANUEL PEREZ
PEREZ v. LICAMELI et al
as 2:2019cv17402
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS, JANE DOES, NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGAN et al v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2019cv07176
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50 (BEING FICTITIOUS NAMES), EDWIN PEREZ, MICHAEL KELLY and others
Plaintiff:
MARIA OLIVARES and SABRINA PAGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMON v. STONE et al
as 3:2018cv16402
Defendant:
CITY OF LONG BRANCH, OFFICER A. GONZALEZ, OFFICER G. SAMOL and others
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF HECTOR CORTES MEJIA and MARIANA RAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
