Cases 41 - 50 of 109
PEDRO v. CITY FITNESS, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03542
Plaintiff:
CARMENCITA MARIA PEDRO
Defendant:
CITY FITNESS, LLC, WHARTON STREET FITNESS, LLC, WALNUT STREET FITNESS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATSINGER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL
as 2:2017cv02948
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATSINGER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , BARBARA ADAMS , DONALD ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rogers v. East Lycoming School District et al
as 4:2017cv00696
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Rogers
Defendant:
East Lycoming School District , Kevin Steele and Michael Pawlik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00301
Plaintiff:
ROGER WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWAIN v. ROGERS et al
as 2:2016cv05067
Plaintiff:
ARNETTA SWAIN
Defendant:
PETER F. ROGERS, LAKEISHA SWAIN and DELTA COMMUNITY INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell et al v. Balon et al
as 4:2016cv00779
Plaintiff:
Bruce M. Campbell and Kim L. Campbell
Defendant:
Charles Balon , Auchter , Szkodny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRADOS v. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2016cv00028
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. GRADOS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON PENNSYLVANIA, SCOTT FERGUS, WASHINGTON COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. CITY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2015cv03955
Plaintiff:
KORI THOMAS
Defendant:
CITY OF CHESTER, JAMISON ROGERS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'BAKER et al v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2015cv00170
Plaintiff:
KEITH O'BAKER and WEST COUNTY AUTO, INC.
Defendant:
BRADLEY D. ALLEN , JAMES R. ROGERS , WILLIAM RAMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ROGERS v. GOGEL et al
as 5:2015cv02111
Plaintiff:
CURTIS LEE ROGERS
Defendant:
MELISSA GOGEL , THE CITY OF ALLENTOWN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
