Cases 71 - 80 of 243
HOLMES v. GORDON AND WEINBERG, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv05308
Plaintiff:
ELLWOOD HOLMES
Defendant:
GORDON AND WEINBERG, P.C. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PARK v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2016cv05025
Plaintiff:
SEAN PARK
Defendant:
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY , AMID ISMAIL , LEONA SPERAZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CURRY v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv04482
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CURRY
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF PA, INC., INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AYERS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04339
Plaintiff:
KEVIN AYERS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN QUINN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEWDNEY v. TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C. et al
as 2:2016cv02865
Plaintiff:
W. DEWDNEY
Defendant:
TABAS AND ROSEN, P.C., X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCKEOWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02475
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MCKEOWN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPT. , ROBERT ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. FUBER et al
as 2:2016cv01869
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM J. FUBER, JR., KELLY WALL, DOMESTIC RELATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMALL v. DENMARK et al
as 2:2016cv00452
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH SMALL
Defendant:
DANIEL DENMARK, JOHN DOES 1-10, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLCOMB v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv06834
Plaintiff:
ADANO HOLCOMB
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SEAN CAVE and POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
