Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Murren v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00706
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. doing business as WAL-MART, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc doing business as SAM'S CLUB and Sam's East, Inc. doing business as SAM'S CLUB
Plaintiff:
Adrain Murren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murren v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 5:2020cv05378
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Sam's Club agent of Sam's Club, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc d/b/a Wal-Mart agent of Wal-Mart and Sam's East Inc. d/b/a Sam's Club agent of Sam's Club
Lead Plaintiff:
Adrain Murren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
UTNIK v. WAL-MART SUPERCENTER
as 3:2019cv00209
Plaintiff:
RYAN UTNIK
Defendant:
WAL-MART SUPERCENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KING v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
LAURETTA R. KING
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, WALMART E-COMMERCE DISTRIBUTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BELL et al v. BOROUGH OF WEST MIFFLIN et al
as 2:2016cv00690
Plaintiff:
SHEKI BELL and ISAAC LEWIS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WEST MIFFLIN , WAL-MART STORES, INC., JOSEPH HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CURRY v. YACHERA et al
as 5:2014cv05253
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CURRY
Defendant:
BRIANNE YACHERA, RICHARD MCCLURE, EXETER TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSBY v. HARPER et al
as 2:2013cv04446
Plaintiff:
OJEA CROSBY
Defendant:
NATHANIEL HARPER, MICHAEL MAGEE, DAVID MCANDREWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENKINS v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2011cv00136
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA JENKINS
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
James, Jr. v. Wal-Mart
as 3:2008cv02210
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt James, Jr.
Defendant:
Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
