Cases 141 - 150 of 848
THE SOCIETY HOUSE, LLC v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2021cv13121
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
THE SOCIETY HOUSE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SERV BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, INC. et al v. HERITAGE CROSSING CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION AND ACCESS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I, LLC
as 3:2021cv10742
Plaintiff:
SERV PROPERTIES AND MANAGEMENT, INC., SERV BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, INC., SERV CENTERS OF NEW JERSEY, INC. and others
Defendant:
HERITAGE CROSSING CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION AND ACCESS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lewis v. Desales
as 1:2021cv00699
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Lewis
Defendant:
Haley Desales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anyan et al v. Lukesh
as 3:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anyan and Sarah Anyan
Defendant:
Billie Ann Lukesh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA LEGAL AID v. TABONE, PHILIP P. LP et al
as 3:2021cv00065
Defendant:
TABONE FAMILY REALTY, LLC, TABONE, PHILIP J. LP, PHILIP TABONE and others
Plaintiff:
SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA LEGAL AID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Lofts at Narrow, LLC v. BOROUGH OF WEST READING
as 5:2021cv02445
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF WEST READING
Plaintiff:
The Lofts at Narrow, LLC
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426
HALEIVI v. CROSBY et al
as 2:2021cv02409
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and G. COSBY
Plaintiff:
YERACHMIEL PINCHAS HALEIVI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MONFLEURY v. MOTT'S LLP
as 2:2021cv08922
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC COS. 1-10 and MOTT'S LLP
Plaintiff:
JEAN LUC MONFLEURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WOODCOCK et al
as 1:2021cv00118
Defendant:
ALLEN WOODCOCK and HEIDI MOON WOODCOCK
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHARIFI v. EAST WINDSOR TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2021cv07965
Defendant:
MAX SHUMANOV, DAVID LEVY and EAST WINDSOR TOWNSHIP
Plaintiff:
PARASTU SHARIFI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
