Cases 1 - 8 of 8
King Alvarez v. HUD, et al
as 22-3282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KING ANTHONY ALVAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a HUD, MARCIA FUDGE, Secretary of HUD, NADAB BYNUM, Director of Community Planning and Development at HUD Philadelphia Regional Office and others
Wolfe v. Catholic Charities et al
as 3:2021cv02119
Plaintiff:
Beverly Ann Wolfe
Defendant:
Catholic Charities and Rob Nicolella
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Wolfe v. Carbon County Housing Authority et al
as 3:2021cv02118
Plaintiff:
Beverly Ann Wolfe
Defendant:
Carbon County Housing Authority, Patty Rogers, Weston T. Brehm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Anyan et al v. Lukesh
as 3:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
Kevin Anyan and Sarah Anyan
Defendant:
Billie Ann Lukesh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SCHILDKNECHT et al v. TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR
as 2:2013cv07228
Plaintiff:
ANN SCHILDKNECHT and ELLEN HEINE
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR and COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WHITEHOUSE v. TARGET CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv01078
Plaintiff:
BOBBI ANN WHITEHOUSE
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION , MOE DOE, LARRY DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Dunlap et al v. Daystar Sills Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00557
Plaintiff:
Anne Dunlap, Deborah Dunlap and James Dunlap
Defendant:
Daystar Sills Inc., David N. Sills, IV, Washington House Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
REGENCY PARK RESIDENT'S ASSOCIATION et al v. REGENCY HOUSING PARTNERS, L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv02465
Plaintiff:
REGENCY PARK RESIDENT'S ASSOCIATION, LISA MARIE MORRIS, LUVENIA CALLUM and others
Defendant:
REGENCY HOUSING PARTNERS, L.P., JOHN A. JENNINGS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
