Cases 1 - 6 of 6
JONES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 1:2023cv01987
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and WILDWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
King Alvarez v. HUD, et al
as 22-3282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KING ANTHONY ALVAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a HUD, MARCIA FUDGE, Secretary of HUD, NADAB BYNUM, Director of Community Planning and Development at HUD Philadelphia Regional Office and others
BELL v. THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2016cv04396
Plaintiff:
JUDY A BELL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, THE CITY OF PASSAIC NJ, PASSAIC HOUSING AUTHORITY OF PASSAIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE BRITH SHOLOM FOUNDATION et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
as 2:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
THE BRITH SHOLOM FOUNDATION , LUCINDA MCBURNETTE and ABDUS SABUR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLEARY et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT et al
as 2:2009cv04590
Plaintiff:
DAVID CLEARY and PATRICIA CLEARY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, SHAUN DONOVAN and SFJV 2002-1, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1701 x(a)(5) National Affordable Housing Act
REGENCY PARK RESIDENT'S ASSOCIATION et al v. REGENCY HOUSING PARTNERS, L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv02465
Plaintiff:
REGENCY PARK RESIDENT'S ASSOCIATION, LISA MARIE MORRIS, LUVENIA CALLUM and others
Defendant:
REGENCY HOUSING PARTNERS, L.P., JOHN A. JENNINGS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
