Cases 11 - 20 of 124
Kelly Bey v. Bechtold et al
as 1:2019cv01467
Petitioner:
David F. Kelly Bey
Respondent:
William Bechtold and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHIPLEY v. MAHALLY et al
as 3:2018cv00067
Petitioner:
JOHN R. SHIPLEY
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY , KELLY CALLIHAN and JOSH D. SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly Bey v. Bechtold
as 3:2017cv02195
Petitioner:
David F. Kelly Bey
Respondent:
James Bechtold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelly Bey v. Warden, Franklin County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00822
Petitioner:
David F. Kelly Bey
Respondent:
Warden, Franklin County Jail and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CIVIDINI v. SESSIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00845
Petitioner:
MASSIMILLIANO CIVIDINI
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS , JOHN KELLY and JENNIFER RITCHEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
J.M.V.R. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00703
Petitioner:
J.M.V.R. and ELSA MILAGROS RODRIGUEZ GARCIA
Respondent:
JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
J.E.L.M. et al v. KELLY et al
as 5:2017cv00704
Petitioner:
J.E.L.M. and MARIA DELMI MARTINEZ NOLASCO
Respondent:
JOHN F. KELLY, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, THOMAS D. HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KELLY v. DELBALSO et al
as 5:2017cv00442
Petitioner:
WAYNE CURTIS KELLY
Respondent:
TERESA DELBALSO, JOHN T. ADAMS and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aaron Kelly v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 16-3535
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
ANDERSON v. MAHALLY et al
as 2:2016cv04425
Petitioner:
KELLY ANDERSON
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
