Cases 21 - 30 of 37
GILLINS v. KEITH et al
as 2:2021cv02591
Petitioner:
SHANI GILLINS
Respondent:
STEVE MILLER and JESSICA KEITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pratt v. Litz et al
as 1:2020cv01071
Defendant:
Jessica Orner, Tina Litz and Emily Bryk
Plaintiff:
Leonttayy A. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KEEL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv02787
Petitioner:
JESSE LEE KEEL, III
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER COURTS, SETH R. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shover v. Brubaker
as 3:2017cv00518
Petitioner:
Richard Paul Shover, II
Respondent:
Jessica E. Brubaker and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. KOSINSKI et al
as 2:2016cv04827
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JONES
Respondent:
GERALD KOSINSKI, JESSICA BASS, LARUE WORTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. KOSINSKIN et al
as 2:2016cv04621
Petitioner:
ARTHUR JONES
Respondent:
GERALD KOSINSKI, JESSICA BASS, DIST ATTNY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Blair Thomas, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 15-1549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLAIR THOMAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ZANE D. MEMEGER and JESSICA NATALI, A.U.S.A.
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv00085
Petitioner:
BLAIR THOMAS, JR.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ZANE DAVID MEMEGER and JESSICA NATALI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HOLTMEYER v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2013cv00128
Petitioner:
JESSICA HOLTMEYER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL and NANCY GIROUX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROOKS v. KANE et al
as 2:2013cv01266
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL BROOKS, JR
Respondent:
HAROLD H. KANE, THOMAS E. GEHRET, CHERYL KREISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
