Cases 21 - 30 of 175
Rad v. Lowe et al
as 1:2021cv00030
Petitioner:
Christopher Rad
Respondent:
Craig A. Lowe and United States of America Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dougan v. Lowe et al
as 1:2020cv02181
Petitioner:
Andrew J. Dougan
Respondent:
Raymond Tonkin, Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Craig Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alford v. Penchishen et al
as 1:2020cv01922
Petitioner:
Craig Alford
Respondent:
Warden David Penchishen and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aucay v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv01512
Respondent:
Jennifer Ritchie, Craig A. Lowe, Kevin McAleenan and others
Petitioner:
Juan Segundo Pando Aucay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BLACKMON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2020cv07507
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and PATRICK NOGAN
Petitioner:
CRAIG BLACKMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moss v. Woolf et al
as 1:2019cv02129
Petitioner:
Craig Moss
Respondent:
Scott A. Woolf, Josh Shapiro, PA State Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ADAMS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2019cv18765
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner:
CRAIG ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Devlin v. Warden White
as 3:2019cv01276
Petitioner:
Craig Devlin
Respondent:
Warden White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BALDWIN v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSHA SHAPIRO et al
as 5:2019cv02527
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY ANDREW BALDWIN
Respondent:
CRAIG WILLIAM STEDMON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF JOSHA SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CARROLL v. TORRANCE STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 5:2019cv01152
Respondent:
THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, TORRANCE STATE HOSPITAL and others
Petitioner:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
