Cases 41 - 50 of 124
ANDERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2017cv03014
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY DONNELL ANDERSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 1:2017cv00791
Petitioner:
Timothy Donnell Anderson
Respondent:
Commonwealth of PA and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PIZZARELLI v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2017cv02903
Petitioner:
ANGELA PIZZARELLI
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIAM ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AQUILINA v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2017cv02243
Petitioner:
DEBRA ANN AQUILINA
Respondent:
WILLIAM ANDERSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2017cv01429
Petitioner:
MAJOR ANDERSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WOODALL v. PORRINO et al
as 1:2017cv01847
Petitioner:
DARA WOODALL
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER PORRINO and WILLIAM ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OSORIO v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2017cv01536
Petitioner:
INEZ OSORIO
Respondent:
WILLIAM ANDERSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. OVERMYER
as 2:2017cv01028
Petitioner:
RAMEL ANDERSON
Respondent:
M. OVERMYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Brittain et al
as 3:2017cv00356
Petitioner:
Warren Anderson
Respondent:
Brittain and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Tice et al
as 3:2017cv00109
Petitioner:
Duane Jay Anderson
Respondent:
Eric Tice and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.