Cases 41 - 50 of 102
HERNANDEZ-MONDRAGON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv09076
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-MONDRAGON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv09025
Petitioner:
ARNULFO SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HERNANDEZ v. MASON et al
as 1:2016cv03922
Petitioner:
ARNULFO SANCHEZ HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
L. MASON and DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez v. Oddo
as 3:2016cv00513
Petitioner:
Manuel David Hernandez
Respondent:
Oddo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HERNANDEZ-RIVERA v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2016cv00551
Petitioner:
OMAR R HERNANDEZ-RIVERA
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HERNANDEZ-FIGUEROA v. RECTENWALD
as 1:2015cv00175
Petitioner:
JOSE O. HERNANDEZ-FIGUEROA
Respondent:
M. RECTENWALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCKNIGHT v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2015cv03842
Petitioner:
RICCARDO MCKNIGHT
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH , HERNANDEZ and DIAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez-Tirado v. Lowe et al
as 3:2014cv02287
Petitioner:
Jose A. Hernandez-Tirado
Respondent:
Craig Lowe, Christopher J. Kane, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HERNANDEZ v. WIEMER et al
as 2:2014cv06499
Petitioner:
ANGEL HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
TREVOR WIEMER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERNANDEZ v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv03189
Petitioner:
MARCOS HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
