Cases 1 - 10 of 23
MILLS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv01368
Petitioner:
CYNTHIA A. MILLS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MILLS v. DIRECTOR OF TOLER HOUSE
as 2:2019cv21088
Petitioner:
ROBERT MILLS
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF TOLER HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mills v. Ebbert
as 1:2018cv02368
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Petitioner:
Eddie Jerome Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mills v. Mahally et al
as 3:2018cv02033
Respondent:
Superintendent Lawrence Mahally and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Petitioner:
George B. Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mills v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2018cv01596
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Robert Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLS v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00136
Petitioner:
LORENZO L. MILLS
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE, PA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mills v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 3:2017cv02287
Petitioner:
James Ronald Mills, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOR v. WANGLEY et al
as 2:2017cv05532
Petitioner:
TEPONG LOR
Respondent:
GEORGE WANGLEY, DAVID N. CZAPO, NICHOLAS E. ORLYK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MILLS v. DELBALSO et al
as 5:2017cv04628
Petitioner:
SELWYN MILLS
Respondent:
THERESA A. DELBALSO, THE ATTORNEY GENRAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mills v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv01331
Petitioner:
George Blaine Mills
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole , John J Talaber and State Attorney General of Penn.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
