Cases 1 - 10 of 28
RUIZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv03679
Petitioner:
RAMON RUIZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruiz v. Barraza
as 1:2023cv00716
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ruiz
Respondent:
Warden Barraza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
RUIZ-FIGUEROA v. CLARK et al
as 5:2018cv02975
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY
Petitioner:
RAFAEL RUIZ-FIGUEROA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RUIZ v. GILMORE et al
as 5:2018cv00880
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER RUIZ
Respondent:
ROBERT GILMORE, PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruiz v. Gilmore et al
as 3:2017cv02229
Petitioner:
Christopher Ruiz
Respondent:
Robert Gilmore and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruiz v. Overmyer et al
as 1:2017cv01979
Petitioner:
Brandon Ruiz
Respondent:
Michael Overmyer, Dauphin County District Attorney and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruiz-Latorre v. Delbaso et al
as 3:2017cv00316
Petitioner:
Miguel Ruiz-Latorre
Respondent:
Theresa Delbaso, Attorney General Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and District Attorney Dauphin County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GALARZA-RUIZ v. SMITH et al
as 5:2016cv05769
Petitioner:
ARIESET GALARZA-RUIZ
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jose Ruiz v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 16-1434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE RUIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY YORK COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Guillermo Ruiz v. Warden Lewisburg USP
as 15-3577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUILLERMO RUIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
