Cases 11 - 20 of 777
FERMAN v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01093
Plaintiff:
EVIN FERMAN
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, CAPTAIN DILLIE and SGT. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
ALONSO-PAYAN v. BROWN SR.
as 2:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ALONSO-PAYAN
Defendant:
SERGEANT A. BROWN SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Brown v. City of Camden, et al
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
TROY A. BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and COUNTY OF CAMDEN
MITCHELL v. HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MITCHELL
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, C/O. PRICE, C/O. DANIELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HIGGS v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv23402
Plaintiff:
DONALD D. HIGGS
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., M. CHERY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berlin Brown v. G. Clemens, et al
as 23-3213
Plaintiff:
BERLIN VANARDO BROWN
Defendant:
CCPM CLEMENS, PREA Coordinator SCI-Camp Hill
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Ralston et al
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Woods
Defendant:
George Ralston, Paula Price, Tracie Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett Tunsil v. Harry Laurel, et al
as 23-3124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARRETT S. TUNSIL
Defendant / Appellee:
HARRY LAUREL, PA-DOC Secretary/C.E.O., WELLPATH INC, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, c/o Michelle Henry and others
Defendant:
AUKER, Medical Director/Administrator, BAKER, Medical Director/Administrator, BECK, Medical Director/Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
