Cases 21 - 30 of 140
King v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00750
Plaintiff:
Tyrone King
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
KING v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv02426
Plaintiff:
DEONDRAE L. KING
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and ROBERT AUGUSTINO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BARRY KING
Defendant:
DENISE RODRIGUEZ, ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE and STEPHANY MCGANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BARRY KING
Defendant:
DENISE RODRIGUEZ, ABIGAIL LOPEZ DE LASALLE and STEPHANY MCGANN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
BUNDY v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv20259
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE BUNDY
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, RYAN AUBEROWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILCOX v. HIRATA et al
as 1:2021cv17905
Plaintiff:
PERRY A. WILCOX
Defendant:
JODY HIRATA, CHARLES WARREN, TILIYA A. KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRAZIER v. KUHN et al
as 2:2021cv16842
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., PATRICK NOGAN, ANTHONY GONGI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. X. PONCE et al
as 1:2021cv05628
Plaintiff:
MARKIESE KING
Defendant:
X. PONCE, DR. KODGER, BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
