Cases 31 - 40 of 1,244
David Meyers v. USA, et al
as 23-2990
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY and JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI
Davon Henderson v. USA
as 23-2933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVON HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEMBY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv21727
Plaintiff:
JAMOR DEMBY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RYAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv20815
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RYAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv20494
Plaintiff:
SAAED MOSLEM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
MEYERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv20443
Plaintiff:
DAVID MYERS and DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF NEW JERSEY and JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guerrero v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Miguel Guerrero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Guerrero v. United States of America ("IACA")
as 1:2023cv01491
Plaintiff:
Miguel Guerrero
Defendant:
United States of America ("IACA")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JONES v. EVANS et al
as 1:2023cv14173
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY W. JONES, II
Defendant:
SCHENETTIA EVANS, HARLIE NELSON, ALISHA GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rodney McIntosh v. USA, et al
as 23-2469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY OTHEL MCINTOSH, AKA Rodney X
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C/O RUMMEL, C/O B. MISSIGMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
