Cases 41 - 48 of 48
William Harrison v. K. Smith, et al
as 10-1865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
K. SMITH, (Case Manager, FCI Ft.Dix), CARROLL, (Unit Manager, FCI Ft. Dix), BARRETT, (Case Manager, USP Canaan) and others
Peet v. Beard et al
as 3:2010cv00482
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J. Peet and Lawrence J. Peet
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D., Then Acting Warden of the SCI Camp Hill, John A. Palakovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARRETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2009cv01017
Plaintiff:
Gerald Barrett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIRANDA v. POLICE DEPT. OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2008cv02013
Plaintiff:
KEVIN C. MIRANDA
Defendant:
POLICE DEPT. OF ATLANTIC CITY, JAMES BARRETT, MICHAEL LOSASSO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carrasquillo v. Foreman et al
as 3:2008cv00612
Plaintiff:
Rene' Carrasquillo
Defendant:
M.C. Foreman, Edward Barrett, Marc A. Renda and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Deubel v. Franklin County Adult Parole and Probation Department et al
as 1:2008cv00261
Plaintiff:
Darrell William Deubel
Defendant:
Franklin County Adult Parole and Probation Department, Brook Alleman and Ed Barrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkney v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2007cv01451
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Pinkney
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Industry Corporation Unicor, James Oheroy-Brady, Dr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Lindsey et al
as 4:2007cv00618
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Williams
Defendant:
Cameron Lindsey, Assistant Warden Camden, Case Manager Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
