Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Ari Bailey v. Forostiak, et al
as 11-2193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DELBERT G. SAUERS, Chief D.S.C.C. Grand Praine, TX, T. L. NORWOOD, Reg Dir., CONNELLY, Assist. Dir. Corr. Prog. Dir. and others
Biggins v. Gile et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
George Gile, Mark D. Daum, Marcili Rispoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAKER et al v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE & DENT. et al
as 2:2011cv01853
Plaintiff:
RALPH BAKER and SHARON BERRY BAKER
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE & DENT., ELMIRA KAPUTIS, JOHN GODINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Connelly, Delbert G. Sauers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steven Dorsey v. Cynthia Daub, et al
as 11-1631
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN DORSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA DAUB, JEFFREY BEARD, DAVID GOODE and others
Derrick Foster v. Jeffrey Raleigh, et al
as 11-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK L. FOSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY RALEIGH, JERRY MARTINEZ, A.D. TOLLACKSON and others
Smith v. Donate et al
as 4:2010cv02133
Plaintiff:
Alan Smith
Defendant:
Janine Donate, Frank Chiarelli, Nancy Carrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Roman Shankaras
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shankaras v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00829
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
