Cases 41 - 50 of 1,665
BRYANT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv04494
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BRYANT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK GARLAND, CRAWFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUBOSE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv04374
Plaintiff:
ZUMAR H. DUBOSE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
David Meyers v. USA, et al
as 23-2990
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY and JUDGE CLAIRE C. CECCHI
Davon Henderson v. USA
as 23-2933
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVON HENDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEMBY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv21727
Plaintiff:
JAMOR DEMBY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Waters v. BOP, et al
as 23-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS WATERS
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY POLLUCK, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY FLORENCE and others
HERBERT v. ASSOCIATE WARDEN et al
as 2:2023cv21377
Plaintiff:
OLAJUWON HERBERT
Defendant:
ASSOCIATE WARDEN, WARDEN, REGINA MARROW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RYAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv20815
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RYAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Postmaster General of the United States, et al
as 23-2719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, CHIEF CHIEF OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION UNIT and MS. KRUSE
MOSLEM v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv20494
Plaintiff:
SAAED MOSLEM
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
