Cases 1 - 10 of 157
VEGA v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
FIDEL VEGA
Defendant:
RACHEL THOMPSON, PRADIP PATEL, M.D., JEFFERY WILK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYANT JR. v. SGT. EL SLOAN et al
as 3:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. BRYANT JR.
Defendant:
SGT. EL SLOAN and OFC. JEFFERIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLOCKER v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv21391
Plaintiff:
KAREEM ABDUL BLOCKER
Defendant:
WARDEN KELLY, SUPERIOR CRIMINAL COURTS, DEPUTY WARDEN CARBARER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery Richardson, et al v. Nicholas Oriolo, et al
as 22-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY RICHARDSON and COLBY RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS ORIOLO, JAMEL SEMPER, All defendants will be sued in both their personal capacity as individuals and their official capacity as officers and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
ALMOS v. CRUTHERS
as 2:2022cv05636
Plaintiff:
LOVE ALMOS
Defendant:
JEFFERY CRUTHERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Henderson et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Alan T. Brooks
Defendant:
David Henderson, Jeffery Kays and Delaware Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RISTER v. BURKE et al
as 2:2021cv04846
Plaintiff:
TARRELL R. RISTER
Defendant:
JEFFERY BURKE, JOSEPH MURRAY and MATTHEW KROUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GITTENS v. PEPPER et al
as 1:2021cv17348
Plaintiff:
DARIUS HEIMER GITTENS
Defendant:
RYAN PEPPER, RAIMON NG, JONATHAN P. GRAMP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHIE v. NARDELLI et al
as 1:2021cv09723
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFFERY POMERANTE and ERIN NARDELLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLY v. ROTH et al
as 1:2021cv09696
Plaintiff:
TONI FLY and WILLIAM ANTHONY FLY
Defendant:
JAY FERGUSON, DANIEL L HOVCAND, M SEGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.