Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Peters v. Joyner et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Donmier Peters
Defendant:
Sgt. Joyner, C.O. Downes, Cpl. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Karl B. Manuel
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Matthew Mucha, Marcus Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Hammond v. Gourley et al
as 1:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
Khalil Hammond
Defendant:
Superintendent Gourley, C.O. Zimmerman, C.O. Iagavino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Hammond et al
as 1:2023cv00953
Plaintiff:
Ramon A. Joyner
Defendant:
Officer Hammond, Officer Luke and Robert May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMANUS v. COUNTY OF LEHIGH et al
as 5:2023cv00464
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCMANUS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF LEHIGH, JACOB E HAMMOND, CHAD L BURRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Khalil Hammond v. Lancaster City Bureau of Police, et al
as 22-1313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALIL K. HAMMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, CITY OF LANCASTER, DETECTIVE SERGEANT JARRAD BERKIHISER and others
HAMMOND v. ACERNO et al
as 2:2021cv03688
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAMMOND
Defendant:
THOMAS ACERNO, CHRISTOPHER CHASE, DAVID HELPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2018cv02353
Defendant:
Edem, Lukashefski, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcellus A Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winter v. Senato et al
as 1:2018cv00351
Plaintiff:
Hermione Kelly Ivy Winter
Defendant:
Christopher Senato, Jim Simms, Gus Christo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMOND v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2017cv01885
Plaintiff:
KHALIL K. HAMMOND
Defendant:
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, JARRAD P. BERKIHISER and LANCASTER CITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
