Cases 21 - 30 of 37
SHULTZ v. HOLLIDAYSBURG/BLAIR COUNTY et al
as 3:2019cv00043
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON BOARD, BLAIR COUNTY PRISON, HOLLIDAYSBURG/BLAIR COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
CREIG SHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CORBIN v. HALLIGAN et al
as 1:2018cv00186
Defendant:
MR. CLARK, MS. LINDER, MS. GUNTHER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. CORBIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
JONES v. ADAMI et al
as 3:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
BLAIR JONES
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMI, JOHN DOE, DOE #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FETTERMAN v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00033
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS DAVID FETTERMAN
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, BRUCE R. ERB, TERRY TOMASSETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv01827
Plaintiff:
Denise Dixon
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Robert Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLSON et al v. BLAIR COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2015cv06285
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GOLSON and SHYANNE WEYANDT
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON, CRAWFORD, GARMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2015cv02454
Plaintiff:
IVAN BLAIR DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN, MAJOR, CAPTIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESPENLAUB v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2014cv00200
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN M. ESPENLAUB, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and BLAIR COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HICKOX v. COUNTY OF BLAIR et al
as 3:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN M. HICKOX
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BLAIR , BLAIR COUNTY PRISON , MICHAEL JOHNSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NADAL v. BLAIR COUNTY PRISON
as 2:2012cv06282
Plaintiff:
BILLY NADAL
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
