Cases 21 - 30 of 30
GRAHAM v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2011cv05824
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GRAHAM
Defendant:
JOYCE ADAMS and JOHN DELEANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ENLOW v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
IDRIS ENLOW
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, SCI-MERCER, SUPT. HARLOW, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM et al v. CARROLL
as 2:2011cv00841
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE K. GRAHAM, JOSEPH E. WATKINS and ESAU T. GRAHAM
Defendant:
DAVID M. CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAVAGE v. CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
ERVIN SAVAGE
Defendant:
CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, PHYSICIANT ASSISTANT HELEN, GRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERILLI v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2010cv04318
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PERILLI
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM, GIORIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. CFCF - CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2010cv01598
Plaintiff:
CARLYLE GRAHAM
Defendant:
CFCF - CURRAN FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and CFCF - MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANNON v. COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY et al
as 2:2009cv01627
Plaintiff:
TYRRALL FARROW CANNON
Defendant:
COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PREVET v. BARONE et al
as 1:2009cv00160
Plaintiff:
JEROME PREVET
Defendant:
MICHAEL C. BARONE, PAUL A. ENNIS, GRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMONTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF PA. et al
as 2:2008cv04029
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. SIMONTON, JR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OF PA., S.C.I.R., GRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PIERSON v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2008cv03513
Plaintiff:
GARY PIERSON
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, RODNEY BROCKENBROUGH, JOYCE ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
