Cases 31 - 40 of 88
GUISEPPE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2017cv04880
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL GUISEPPE
Defendant:
MCFADDEN , REED , JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER et al v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
DARREN MILLER and DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MARYBETH ANDERSON, MAX GOTTESMAN, MICHAEL CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAUR v. SCI CHESTER et al
as 2:2017cv02461
Plaintiff:
BRIAN D. BAUR
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #4, JOHN DOE #1, SUPERINTENDENT MARIROSA LLAMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2017cv00883
Plaintiff:
EUGENE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SEAN P. KILKENNY, DEPUTY JOHN DOE (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv00217
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PILLAI, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUR v. LAUGHINGHOUSE et al
as 2:2016cv02281
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BAUR
Defendant:
B. LAUGHINGHOUSE, DEJESUS, S. SUDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VACTOR v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
ROGER TODD VACTOR
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, JASON W. REED, JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2016cv00021
Defendant:
MICHAEL D. OVERMYER, PAUL A. ENNIS, ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN E. GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANIGAULT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00192
Plaintiff:
ALANTE MANIGAULT
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, LT. SHEA, L. S. KERNS-BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DASILVA v. DETENTION CENTER COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2015cv02150
Plaintiff:
PEDRO MIGUEL PINHO DASILVA
Defendant:
DETENTION CENTER COUNTY JAIL, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
