Cases 41 - 50 of 142
SELDON v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2019cv00090
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE SELDON
Defendant:
DR. SUTHERLAND, JOHN DOE LEE, ROBERT MAXA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ENOCH v. PERRY et al
as 1:2019cv00026
Defendant:
SUTTERLANDER, DEPUTY SECRETERY TREVOR WINGARD, LISA LAMOREAUX and others
Plaintiff:
REV. AUGUSTUS SIMMONS ENOCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01687
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, JARED ANKROM, LISA DUNCAN and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BRADSHAW v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv05342
Defendant:
LISA DURAND, JOHN WETZEL, DORINA VARNER and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA BRADSHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv05087
Defendant:
LISA DURAND, C/O B. DAVIS, C/O LAIUVARA and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDEZ v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv04740
Defendant:
LISA DURAND, TODD FAUBERT, C/O B. WILKINSON and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO A. MENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEY et al v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01339
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, OFFICE OF POPULATION MANAGEMENT, SCOTT A KNICKELSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WALKER, QUINTEZ TALLEY, GARLAND BAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIVERA v. CRANE et al
as 2:2018cv02947
Defendant:
LISA DURAND, LIEUTENANT CRANE and CYNTHIA LINK
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. DUPONT et al
as 2:2018cv00665
Plaintiff:
MUSTAFA ALI
Defendant:
JOSEPH H. DUPONT, MICHAEL OVERMYER, DERRICK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE-JONES v. CAPOZZI et al
as 2:2018cv00635
Plaintiff:
AKEEM PAGE-JONES
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LANEL CAPOZZI, DEPUTY NICKELSON, LT. ALBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
