Cases 1 - 10 of 65
NARCISSE v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
EDWARD NARCISSE
Defendant:
A. GARCIA, P. THOMPSON, SECRETARY OF DOC LINDA HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00247
Defendant:
DOC CENTRAL OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION, SCI GREENE, SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
JACK ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COIT v. PA DOC, et al
as 3:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
DEPUTY SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and PA DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. ANDIMAR et al
as 2:2024cv01155
Defendant:
CO GUARD ANDIMAR, DOC, CO GUARD FOWLER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, MR. MATIYASIC, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GOHLMAN v. BOYD et al
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GOHLMAN
Defendant:
M. BOYD and DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01972
Plaintiff:
NAISHA TISDALE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK BROTHERS, KEVIN RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGURL v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
HAROLD J. MCGURL, JR.
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, CORRECTIONS OFFICER D. COSTELLO, CORRECTIONS OFFICER R. OHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. PA DOC et al
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS
Defendant:
PA DOC and WELLPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
