Cases 1 - 10 of 15
PUMBA v. MALDONADO et al
as 5:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
SERGIO MALDONADO, MICHAEL DAILEY, DREW KALINASKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUMBA v. Lehigh County Jail Administration et al
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
Lehigh County Jail Administration, Robert McFadden, Sal Madrid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUMBA v. LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL et al
as 5:2021cv05585
Plaintiff:
OSVALDO PUMBA
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY JAIL, SGT. DREW KHALINASKI, SERGIO MALDONADO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DREW et al v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE DREW, TYRIS L. DAVIS and AKH WORLD
Defendant:
DOUGLASS W. CHEW, WESTMORELAND COUNTY, GINA CERILLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DREW v. WALTON et al
as 2:2018cv01452
Plaintiff:
AL-AKH AKHBAR and ANTOINE DREW
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN LOWTHER, DEPUTY WARDEN SCHWARTZ, C/O THOMASINA CONKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
DREW v. WALTON et al
as 2:2018cv01118
Defendant:
JEFF LNU, DAWN BICKERTON, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
MUSLIMS INCARCERATED IN AMERICA (MIA INC.) and ANTOINE DREW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARNES v. MILLER et al
as 2:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DANTE BARNES
Defendant:
MILLER, JENKINS, MCGUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COLEMAN v. MCGARVIE et al
as 1:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
DREW COLEMAN
Defendant:
NANCIE R. FLYNN MCGARVIE and BEVERLY SUMMERS OROURKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODKEY v. NEWMAN et al
as 2:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
DREW A. RODKEY
Defendant:
SGT. NEWMAN and OFFICER CASTELLO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DREW v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. DREW
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and JOHN E. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
