Cases 1 - 10 of 21
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CARTER
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, FAYETTE COUNTY, FAYETTE COUNTY EXECUTIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv00786
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, LOIS ALLEN, MARK CAPPOZZA and others
Plaintiff:
PARIS L. JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BUTERA v. PRIME CARE et al
as 2:2020cv04691
Defendant:
NURSE JANE DOE - 10, NURSE JANE DOE - 1, NURSE JANE DOE - 4 and others
Plaintiff:
DAMON BUTERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSE v. DOE #1 et al
as 2:2020cv02683
Defendant:
SRGT MCGONIGLE, JOHN DOE #5, GABRIEL PRICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAY v. LORI et al
as 3:2020cv00085
Defendant:
SGT. LORI, JOHN DOE #5, C/O ORBASH and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE GAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SCHRUBY v. SIANNI et al
as 2:2019cv04206
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK SCHRUBY and TEEF
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, CLAYTON, JANE DOE NURSE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUISEPPE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2017cv04880
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL GUISEPPE
Defendant:
MCFADDEN , REED , JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DASILVA v. DETENTION CENTER COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2015cv02150
Plaintiff:
PEDRO MIGUEL PINHO DASILVA
Defendant:
DETENTION CENTER COUNTY JAIL, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
