Cases 101 - 110 of 840,519
Brooks v. City of Cleveland et al.
as 1:2024cv01590
Defendant:
Dennis Murphy, John James, Jack Bornfield and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
NIMMO v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04913
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY NIMMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOUGHTY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04927
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DONALD DOUGHTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GARCIA v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04929
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
JOHN R GARCIA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GOMEZ v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04930
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
MARCO GOMEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04931
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
JACKIE DENISE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LLOYD v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04932
Plaintiff:
DONNA LLOYD
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POPLIN v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04933
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY POPLIN
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04934
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
COREY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv04935
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
TABAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
