Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BURNS v. CAPACITY MARINE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv07222
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA BURNS
Defendant:
CAPACITY MARINE CORPORATION, THE CAPACITY GROUP, LAURA DIPIAZZA and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BURNS v. FLYTE TYME WORLDWIDE
as 2:2013cv04297
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BURNS
Defendant:
FLYTE TYME WORLDWIDE and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROLL v. HAMMOND TRAIER & BURNS, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv06800
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ROLL
Defendant:
HAMMOND TRAIER & BURNS, LLC and NEIL BURNS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROCKWELL et al v. THE PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2012cv00403
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROCKWELL , BRIAN McELIECE , JASON ALEXANDER and others
Defendant:
THE PEPSI BEVERAGES COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ZAS et al v. CANADA DRY BOTTLING COMPANY OF NEW YORK, L.P. et al
as 2:2012cv01649
Plaintiff:
JACK ZAS , JOSEPH BURNE , NEAL GRUTTEMEYER and others
Defendant:
CANADA DRY BOTTLING COMPANY OF NEW YORK, L.P. and JOHNS DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
TEANECK POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL 215 et al v. TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
as 2:2009cv06339
Plaintiff:
TEANECK POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION LOCAL 215, GERARD ROSANO, JOHN ABRAHAM and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF TEANECK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jeffrey Burns v. Salem Tube Inc, et al
as 09-3382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
SALEM TUBE INC and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MFG, ENERGY, ALLIED IND AND SER WORKERS INTL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, LOCAL 3713-05
BURNS v. SALEM TUBE, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2008cv00289
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BURNS
Defendant:
SALEM TUBE, INCORPORATED and UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO-CLC, LOCAL 3713-05
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
