Cases 101 - 110 of 728
UCETA v. SHARP CORPORATION
as 5:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
ANYERILYS UCETA
Defendant:
SHARP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kimmel v. Atlantic Carbon Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jason Kimmel
Defendant:
Atlantic Carbon Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
NORTHROP v. EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID NORTHROP
Defendant:
EASTERN AIRLINES, LLC and JOSEPH MAROTTA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
WEDDE v. EAST ALLEN TOWNSHIP et al
as 5:2022cv00297
Plaintiff:
ROSE WEDDE
Defendant:
EAST ALLEN TOWNSHIP and BRENT GREEN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
STROPE v. PARK FAMILY ENTERPRISES LLC
as 2:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY STROPE
Defendant:
PARK FAMILY ENTERPRISES LLC doing business as MCDONALD'S
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Schaller-Dubois v. A&S Kinard
as 1:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Wendy Schaller-Dubois
Defendant:
A&S Kinard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Smith v. Keystone Premier Settlement Services, LLC
as 5:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Lucy Smith
Defendant:
Keystone Premier Settlement Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
UCETA v. SHARP CORPORATION
as 2:2022cv00853
Plaintiff:
ANYERILYS UCETA
Defendant:
SHARP CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LAWRENCE v. THE WIRELESS EXPERIENCE OF PA, INC.
as 2:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
SETH LAWRENCE
Defendant:
THE WIRELESS EXPERIENCE OF PA, INC. doing business as WIRELESS EXPERIENCE
Scott v. Fiestas WVA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott
Defendant:
Fiestas WVA, LLC doing business as Taco Bell and Aarsand Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
